Spurs Waste Rp750bn as Solanke and Soldado Become Symbols of Forward-Line Failure
Baca dalam 60 detik
- Tottenham Hotspur menggelontorkan dana besar untuk mendatangkan penyerang, tetapi produktivitas gol Solanke dan Soldado jauh dari ekspektasi.
- Kegagalan dua striker mahal ini menyoroti lemahnya strategi rekrutmen Spurs dalam mencari pengganti Harry Kane.
- Manajemen klub dituntut lebih cermat menilai kualitas pemain agar tidak terulang kesalahan serupa di bursa transfer mendatang.

Tottenham Hotspur's failure to bring in a quality centre-forward has come under scrutiny again after Dominic Solanke and Roberto Soldado delivered performances far below the price the club paid. The two names are costly proof that big spending does not guarantee sharpness in front of goal.
Since Harry Kane's departure, Spurs have indeed kept searching for a worthy replacement. The management did not hold back on funds, including signing Solanke from Bournemouth for a fee that at the time broke the club record, namely 75 million pounds in the summer of 2024. However, until now, expectations have not been met.
Solanke has scored only 13 goals in 50 league appearances. Injuries and inconsistency have cost him his position as the main spearhead under Roberto De Zerbi. This season, he has even started only half of the matches and has scored just once, and that was against a struggling Manchester United.
Solanke's story recalls Roberto Soldado, who was signed from Valencia in 2013 for 26 million pounds. At the time, Soldado was seen as the solution up front after Gareth Bale's departure. In reality, he scored only 16 goals in 76 matches in all competitions, seven of them in the league. Spurs' total outlay on Soldado, including wages, reached 37 million pounds. He was later sold to Villarreal for 16 million pounds, leaving the club 10 million pounds out of pocket.
Interestingly, if cost per goal is calculated, Solanke may look more efficient because his price was nearly three times that of Soldado. Even so, both Solanke and Soldado failed to meet expectations. Both have become symbols of waste in Spurs' forward line.
This failure is not only about money, but also about the impact on the team's performance. Spurs, who are building a squad with De Zerbi, should be more selective in choosing strikers. Besides Solanke, there is also Omar Marmoush, brought in from Manchester City, but he has scored only one goal in seven appearances. Richarlison has even been dropped from the Premier League squad and now plays for the U-21 team.
On the other hand, Spurs have shown improvement in other areas, such as the 2-0 win over Chelsea last weekend. However, the problems up front remain a major task. The management needs to learn from past mistakes so as not to keep throwing money at strikers who do not fit the team's needs.
Going forward, Spurs are required to have a more mature recruitment strategy. Will they go back to hunting expensive strikers or start relying on the academy and young players? The answer will determine the club's direction over the next few seasons.



