Michelle O'Neill Refuses to Resign, Calls Drumcree Parade 'Sectarian and Triumphalist'
Baca dalam 60 detik
- Menteri Utama Irlandia Utara Michelle O'Neill menolak desakan DUP untuk mundur terkait protes parade Drumcree.
- O'Neill menegaskan dirinya berdiri di sisi warga Garvaghy Road dan menyebut parade 27 September sebagai tindakan sektarian.
- Ketegangan di Stormont memanas saat polisi menyelidiki protes ilegal yang menghalangi pawai Orde Oranye.

Northern Ireland First Minister Michelle O'Neill has firmly rejected the Democratic Unionist Party's (DUP) call for her to resign. The pressure came over her role in protests against the Drumcree parade in Portadown, County Armagh. In an emergency sitting at the Stormont Assembly on Monday (23/9), O'Neill faced sharp questioning from DUP assembly member Phillip Brett, who accused her of breaching the ministerial code.
Brett demanded that O'Neill "drop the false bravado" and claimed she had shown "total contempt" for the pledge of office. "If you are found to have breached the ministerial code or the law, will you do the honourable thing for once and resign as first minister?" Brett asked. O'Neill responded dismissively, "Catch yourself on," which in everyday speech means "wise up" or "don't exaggerate." She insisted she would continue to stand up for the people of Garvaghy Road. "I am proud to stand with them and I will continue to stand with them," she said.
The parade, planned for 27 September, was described by O'Neill as "unwanted, sectarian and triumphalist." She said the march was not only unlawful but also morally wrong. Her statement drew a fierce reaction from unionist parties. Timothy Gaston of the Traditional Unionist Voice (TUV) labelled O'Neill a "first minister for lawbreaking." O'Neill hit back firmly, "I am a first minister for what is right." She also took a swipe at a TUV assembly member who posted an AI image that exaggerated the size of a loyalist rally in Portadown, saying, "We don't need AI for that."
Tensions at Stormont escalated further when DUP assembly member Jonathan Buckley questioned whether O'Neill would "accept and abide by the legal ruling of the courts" on the parade dispute. O'Neill replied, "When the law is wrong, I will stand firmly against it," and called the planned march "morally wrong." She also called on DUP members to feel "shame" for what she said was their support for the parade. "Your party has championed this," she told DUP members across the chamber.
"I am proud to stand with them and I will continue to stand with them." โ Michelle O'Neill, Northern Ireland First Minister
Earlier, Stormont Assembly Speaker Edwin Poots highlighted O'Neill's absence from last week's sitting to answer an urgent question. Poots described the absence as "disrespectful" to the assembly and the public. "Members know my view about ministers being accountable to this assembly on behalf of the people who put us here," he said. O'Neill also rejected a claim by Ulster Unionist Party (UUP) leader Jon Burrows that many people now regarded her as "utterly morally bankrupt."
The crisis has once again highlighted the historical tensions between nationalist and unionist communities in Northern Ireland. The Drumcree parade has long been a flashpoint since the 1990s, when the Orange Order insisted on passing through the predominantly nationalist Garvaghy Road. The illegal protest that blocked this year's march triggered a police investigation and sharpened the debate over freedom of assembly versus community rights. O'Neill, as vice president of Sinn Fรฉin, is at the centre of a political storm that is testing the stability of the power-sharing government at Stormont.
Looking ahead, the court ruling on the parade appeal will be decisive. If the court allows the parade to pass through Garvaghy Road, the potential for physical clashes and a fresh political crisis may be unavoidable. If it is banned, unionist groups will increasingly accuse O'Neill of interfering in the legal process. Will a compromise be found, or will Northern Ireland return to a cycle of confrontation that threatens peace?



