Jadwal Sholat

Memuat jadwal sholatโ€ฆ

Ilmu Komputer & AI editorial

Open AccessOA2026

OSNR/GSNR Prediction in Brownfield Links via a DLM-Anchored Hybrid Physics/ML Model

A hybrid physics/ML framework calibrates span and ILA boundaries using DLM, achieving sub-0.5 dB accuracy for per-channel power, OSNR, and GSNR in brownfield optical networks.
Agastya Raj; Venkata Virajit Garbhapu; Hiroyuki Ishihara; Peyman Pahlevanzadeh; Hideki Nishizawa; Takeo Sasai; Daniel C. Kilper; Marco Ruffiniยท 2026ยท DOI 10.48550/arXiv.2607.12152

The core problem

Brownfield optical links present unique challenges for performance prediction due to legacy infrastructure, unknown fiber parameters, and heterogeneous equipment. Accurate prediction of per-channel power, optical signal-to-noise ratio (OSNR), and generalized signal-to-noise ratio (GSNR) is critical for efficient network planning and service provisioning. Traditional physics-based models often fail in brownfield environments because they rely on precise knowledge of span losses, amplifier gains, and inline amplifier (ILA) locations, which are frequently unavailable or inaccurate. Machine learning (ML) approaches can learn from data but may lack physical interpretability and generalize poorly to unseen configurations. This work introduces a hybrid physics/ML framework anchored by a digital line model (DLM) to bridge this gap. The DLM provides a physics-based reference that calibrates span and ILA boundaries, enabling the ML component to correct residual errors. The framework is evaluated on brownfield links for single-channel and optical spectrum as a service (OSaaS) provisioning, demonstrating OSNR and GSNR prediction errors of no more than 0.39 dB and 0.43 dB, respectively. This di

Innovation

The framework was evaluated on brownfield links under two provisioning scenarios: single-channel and OSaaS. For single-channel provisioning, the hybrid model achieved OSNR prediction errors of no more than 0.39 dB and GSNR errors of no more than 0.43 dB. For OSaaS, which involves multiple channels across the spectrum, similar accuracy was maintained, with OSNR and GSNR errors within 0.39 dB and 0.43 dB, respectively. These results represent a significant improvement over uncalibrated physics-based models, which typically exhibit errors exceeding 1 dB in brownfield environments. The calibration of span and ILA boundaries via DLM was crucial; without it, the ML model alone struggled to achieve sub-dB accuracy. The table below summarizes the maximum errors observed.

| Scenario | Max OSNR Error (dB) | Max GSNR Error (dB) |
|----------|---------------------|---------------------|
| Single-channel | 0.39 | 0.43 |
| OSaaS | 0.39 | 0.43 |

The results demonstrate that the hybrid approach generalizes well across different link configurations and channel counts, making it suitable for practical deployment in brownfield networks.

Brownfield optical links present unique challenges for performance prediction due to legacy infrastructure, unknown fiber parameters, and heterogeneous equipment. Accurate prediction of per-channel power, optical signal-to-noise ratio (OSNR), and generalized signal-to-noise ratio (GSNR) is critical for efficient network planning and service provisioning. Traditional physics-based models often fail in brownfield environments because they rely on precise knowledge of span losses, amplifier gains, and inline amplifier (ILA) locations, which are frequently unavailable or inaccurate. Machine learning (ML) approaches can learn from data but may lack physical interpretability and generalize poorly to unseen configurations. This work introduces a hybrid physics/ML framework anchored by a digital line model (DLM) to bridge this gap. The DLM provides a physics-based reference that calibrates span and ILA boundaries, enabling the ML component to correct residual errors. The framework is evaluated on brownfield links for single-channel and optical spectrum as a service (OSaaS) provisioning, demonstrating OSNR and GSNR prediction errors of no more than 0.39 dB and 0.43 dB, respectively. This digest outlines the methodology, results, and implications of this approach.

The proposed framework combines a physics-based DLM with a machine learning correction stage. The DLM simulates signal propagation through the optical link using standard fiber and amplifier models, but its parameters (e.g., span losses, ILA positions) are calibrated using measured data. Calibration is performed by minimizing the discrepancy between DLM predictions and a set of reference measurements, which may include per-channel power or OSNR at specific points. The calibrated DLM then serves as a feature extractor and baseline predictor. An ML model, such as a neural network or gradient boosting regressor, is trained on the residuals between DLM predictions and ground truth to capture unmodeled effects like nonlinearities, filter penalties, or equipment-specific behaviors. The hybrid model outputs per-channel power, OSNR, and GSNR. The framework is designed for brownfield links where full physical knowledge is lacking. The calibration process is formulated as an optimization problem: given measured data and DLM parameters , find

, where is the DLM function. The ML correction is then
, with being features from the DLM and measurements. The overall workflow is illustrated in the Mermaid diagram below.

Why it matters

The key insight of this work is that anchoring ML with a calibrated physics model mitigates the data inefficiency and poor extrapolation of pure ML, while compensating for the inaccuracies of pure physics in brownfield scenarios. The DLM calibration effectively identifies span and ILA boundaries, which are often the largest sources of uncertainty. The residual ML correction then captures second-order effects such as nonlinear interference, filter narrowing, and transceiver imperfections. The achieved accuracy of โ‰ค0.39 dB for OSNR and โ‰ค0.43 dB for GSNR is within the tolerance required for many network planning and optimization tasks, including power balancing and service provisioning. The framework's ability to handle both single-channel and OSaaS scenarios indicates its versatility. However, the approach relies on the availability of some reference measurements for calibration; in fully unmeasured links, alternative methods may be needed. Future work could explore reducing the number of calibration points, extending to multi-vendor environments, and integrating the model into real-time control loops. The hybrid physics/ML paradigm is promising for other network domains where physical models are imperfect but data is scarce.

Who should read this

CS practitioners and researchers

Opening member contentโ€ฆ