Ilmu Komputer & AI editorial
Subgroup Packing for Batched PASTA Transciphering
The core problem
Innovation
Across twelve paired corpora under six homomorphic keys, all 24 direct and subgroup conversions and all 48 subsequent queries return the expected values and required zeroes. The median paired ratio of direct to subgroup server cost is 1.60, including fresh public generation, conversion, and two queries. In other words, the subgroup layout reduces server cost by roughly 37.5% relative to the contiguous layout on the median paired run. The reduction is consistent across the paired corpora and keys, and it is attributed to the halving of required displacements: 255 for the contiguous layout versus 128 for the subgroup layout. The authors also report that the reduction comes with less remaining noise capacity, establishing a packing-dependent cost–noise tradeoff. The results are summarized in the following flow:
The cost model can be written as $C_{\tex
The authors implement three equally batched schedules for complete PASTA-3 conversion and subsequent public subset-sum queries in HElib. The experimental design is paired: twelve corpora are evaluated under six homomorphic keys, yielding 24 direct and subgroup conversions and 48 subsequent queries. The direct layout stores each record's words contiguously, while the subgroup layout interleaves records so that cyclic shifts act within a coset of a cyclic subgroup. Formally, if the batch has records and each record has words, the contiguous layout places record at positions , whereas the subgroup layout places it at a coset of a cyclic subgroup
Why it matters
Who should read this
Opening member content…