Computer Science editorial
Open AccessOA2025
Description, Causal Explanation, and Policy Intervention in Sociology
Goldthorpe argues that sociology must move from description to causal explanation via social mechanisms to effectively inform policy. He emphasizes the importance of good description and the distinction between causes of effects and effects of causes.
J. Goldthorpe· KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie· 2025· DOI 10.1007/s11577-025-01044-7
The core problem
The paper addresses the relationship between description and causal explanation in sociology, drawing on an ongoing controversy in British sociology. Goldthorpe starts from the distinction between the causes of effects and the effects of causes, and from a more instructive controversy in epidemiology. He emphasizes three points: the importance of good description, the need for causal explanations in terms of social processes or mechanisms, and the necessity of moving from description to explanation for sociology to contribute to effective social policy.
Innovation
The paper is a theoretical and conceptual contribution, not an empirical study. It restates and develops a previously taken position on the relation between description and causal explanation. The methodology involves conceptual analysis and argumentation, drawing on examples from British sociology and epidemiology to illustrate the issues.
Introduction
The paper addresses the relationship between description and causal explanation in sociology, drawing on an ongoing controversy in British sociology. Goldthorpe starts from the distinction between the causes of effects and the effects of causes, and from a more instructive controversy in epidemiology. He emphasizes three points: the importance of good description, the need for causal explanations in terms of social processes or mechanisms, and the necessity of moving from description to explanation for sociology to contribute to effective social policy.
Why it matters
The paper discusses the implications of the argument for sociological practice and policy intervention. Goldthorpe suggests that sociology has an increasing scope to contribute to effective social policy, but this requires a proper understanding of causal mechanisms. He also notes the need to understand the possible limits of such policy. The discussion engages with controversies in British sociology and epidemiology to clarify the issues.
Who should read this
Pembaca Research Digest dan praktisi rumpun ini.
Opening member content…